[limen GEN-a-organvm-call-function--ontological-test-coverage-0620] Raise test coverage in a-organvm/call-function--ontological#13
Conversation
limen task GEN-a-organvm-call-function--ontological-test-coverage-0620
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a3c4505cbb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ | |||
| """Tests for the FUNCTIONcalled naming validator.""" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This new test module is added under tests/, but the repository's current validation workflow runs python -m pytest tools/ -v in .github/workflows/validate.yml line 42, and the contributor docs use the same tools/ test command. As a result, these coverage tests are skipped in CI and by the documented test command, so regressions in tools/validate_naming.py still won't be caught unless someone manually runs plain pytest; either move the tests under tools/ or update the workflow/docs command to include tests/.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
Disposition: Verified this as substantive coverage before merging: the PR adds |
1 participant
Autonomous limen dispatch of task
GEN-a-organvm-call-function--ontological-test-coverage-0620.Find the largest source module in a-organvm/call-function--ontological with little or no test coverage and add a focused, PASSING test suite for it. Run the repo's own test command and confirm green. No placeholder tests. [auto-generated 2026-06-20 to keep the stream endless]
Produced in an isolated worktree off origin — review before merge.